nivek
As Above So Below
Are The Pentagon’s UFO Program Statements Simply Misinformation?
The Pentagon have seemingly made a big mistake with regards to reporting on AATIP, AAWSAP and Elizondo. At some point in 2019, someone decided to walk back the verified admissions of the December 16th NYT and Politico articles that acknowledged and verified the United States Government studied unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). This may be a simple case of misinformation between unfamiliar offices, but that argument is becoming increasingly unlikely.
I genuinely do feel sorry for the Pentagon spokesperson, whoever it may be, they certainly have to front a lot of obvious mistruths. The most recent AATIP article from Tim McMillan pretty much destroyed the reconstructed narrative of 2019 that AATIP/AAWSAP had nothing to do with UFOs and Elizondo wasn’t the director or involved in any way.
Many have since speculated that the specific data fed to Susan Gough and others ensured that it couldn’t have simply been a case of misinformation. The statements given were precise, particular and full of intentional purpose. In short, they appeared to be coming from a disingenuous source from within the DOD which almost ruled out the misinformation angle.
So, what has that meant?
Well, the release of McMillan’s article has since left the Pentagon in an awkward position.
Either way, the upcoming statement from Gough goes straight into the mainstream regardless of what direction they take. Confirm AATIP was UAP and the media cycle goes again, deny it and the media cycle goes again but with a big black question mark over their integrity.
For me it was very poor management, if they had left the initial acknowledgment in place this would have died down, people would have been accepting that the Pentagon studied UFOs. Big deal.
Now, it is a big deal. Now, it looks to the world like the Pentagon have been intentionally lying in 2019. But no big deal right?
Have the pentagon and DOD been less than accurate about UFOs previously?
This wouldn’t be the first time we have seen this happen. Under pressure from President Clinton and others in the 1990, the Air Force and DOD were forced to give a conference on the famous Roswell case alongside a surprisingly subjective, opinion based paper entitled ‘The RoswellReport: Case Closed’ by James McAndrew.
*Disclaimer, I don’t know what happened at Roswell, I am focused on the changing opinion of the Pentagon towards the case.
In their investigation, the Air Force made no attempt to contact or put on record the hundred plus witnesses who were alive and available at the time, they made no attempt to back up claims of a mogul balloon with supporting evidence and documentation, and furthermore, made no attempt to explain how crash test dummies could be appropriately and conclusively explained for the testimony of reports that saw alledged ‘beings’. Interesting, the army didn’t start using crash test dummies for another 10 years following 1947.
Col. Haynes at the 1997 Roswell press conference.
What they did do however, was to confirm their first press statement on 1947 about a ‘captured crashed disc’ was false. Their second statement in 1947, that the object was a weather balloon, was actually an active lie to protect the classified project mogul program.
And thirdly, their statement that the objects (two crashes) were simply a mogul balloon was not backed up by documentation, testimony or data, plus Major Marcel (below) would later go on record to say it was all a lie.
At Fort Worth Army Air Field, Major Jesse A. Marcel (looking left) of Houma, LA – holding foil debris from Roswell, New Mexico, UFO incident, 07/08/1947
The Roswell Record 1947. The Pentagon admit they capture a flying saucer.
The Pentagon change the story to that of a weather balloon in 1947.
Now, whether the crashes at Roswell were German, Russian or Alien, it doesn’t really make a difference, the point that can be proven here is that the Pentagon gave contradictorystatements over and over, one confirmed false and one confirmed a lie.
Sound familiar? Confusing, contradictory statements seemingly are a part of UFO research and the Pentagon.
As we await Susan Gough to come back to us with an updated statement on AATIP, AAWSAP and Elizondo(?), we know we shouldn’t expect the complete truth. Even if they come back and shockingly tell us AATIP studied little grey men and they had a body stored in Bigelow fridge, I wouldn’t trust it (obviously).
This is an organisation that has fractured, moving parts, all with their own agendas, all with a say and influence in how classified material is released. Potentially, this phenomenon is being studied by multiple agencies in secret with no oversight.
Special access programs with counter intelligence may effectively stove pipe information from the public, potential enemies and other agencies but the question must be asked, is this impending progress in the long term?
It has taken two years of acclimatisation for the public to understand the position of why certain decisions were made by DOD in the best interest of the Western powers. But, if you walk back AATIP, you walk back the understanding and trust which has been delicately built between the Pentagon and the people.
.
The Pentagon have seemingly made a big mistake with regards to reporting on AATIP, AAWSAP and Elizondo. At some point in 2019, someone decided to walk back the verified admissions of the December 16th NYT and Politico articles that acknowledged and verified the United States Government studied unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). This may be a simple case of misinformation between unfamiliar offices, but that argument is becoming increasingly unlikely.
I genuinely do feel sorry for the Pentagon spokesperson, whoever it may be, they certainly have to front a lot of obvious mistruths. The most recent AATIP article from Tim McMillan pretty much destroyed the reconstructed narrative of 2019 that AATIP/AAWSAP had nothing to do with UFOs and Elizondo wasn’t the director or involved in any way.
Many have since speculated that the specific data fed to Susan Gough and others ensured that it couldn’t have simply been a case of misinformation. The statements given were precise, particular and full of intentional purpose. In short, they appeared to be coming from a disingenuous source from within the DOD which almost ruled out the misinformation angle.
So, what has that meant?
Well, the release of McMillan’s article has since left the Pentagon in an awkward position.
Either way, the upcoming statement from Gough goes straight into the mainstream regardless of what direction they take. Confirm AATIP was UAP and the media cycle goes again, deny it and the media cycle goes again but with a big black question mark over their integrity.
For me it was very poor management, if they had left the initial acknowledgment in place this would have died down, people would have been accepting that the Pentagon studied UFOs. Big deal.
Now, it is a big deal. Now, it looks to the world like the Pentagon have been intentionally lying in 2019. But no big deal right?
Have the pentagon and DOD been less than accurate about UFOs previously?
This wouldn’t be the first time we have seen this happen. Under pressure from President Clinton and others in the 1990, the Air Force and DOD were forced to give a conference on the famous Roswell case alongside a surprisingly subjective, opinion based paper entitled ‘The RoswellReport: Case Closed’ by James McAndrew.
*Disclaimer, I don’t know what happened at Roswell, I am focused on the changing opinion of the Pentagon towards the case.
In their investigation, the Air Force made no attempt to contact or put on record the hundred plus witnesses who were alive and available at the time, they made no attempt to back up claims of a mogul balloon with supporting evidence and documentation, and furthermore, made no attempt to explain how crash test dummies could be appropriately and conclusively explained for the testimony of reports that saw alledged ‘beings’. Interesting, the army didn’t start using crash test dummies for another 10 years following 1947.
Col. Haynes at the 1997 Roswell press conference.
What they did do however, was to confirm their first press statement on 1947 about a ‘captured crashed disc’ was false. Their second statement in 1947, that the object was a weather balloon, was actually an active lie to protect the classified project mogul program.
And thirdly, their statement that the objects (two crashes) were simply a mogul balloon was not backed up by documentation, testimony or data, plus Major Marcel (below) would later go on record to say it was all a lie.
At Fort Worth Army Air Field, Major Jesse A. Marcel (looking left) of Houma, LA – holding foil debris from Roswell, New Mexico, UFO incident, 07/08/1947
The Roswell Record 1947. The Pentagon admit they capture a flying saucer.
The Pentagon change the story to that of a weather balloon in 1947.
Now, whether the crashes at Roswell were German, Russian or Alien, it doesn’t really make a difference, the point that can be proven here is that the Pentagon gave contradictorystatements over and over, one confirmed false and one confirmed a lie.
Sound familiar? Confusing, contradictory statements seemingly are a part of UFO research and the Pentagon.
As we await Susan Gough to come back to us with an updated statement on AATIP, AAWSAP and Elizondo(?), we know we shouldn’t expect the complete truth. Even if they come back and shockingly tell us AATIP studied little grey men and they had a body stored in Bigelow fridge, I wouldn’t trust it (obviously).
This is an organisation that has fractured, moving parts, all with their own agendas, all with a say and influence in how classified material is released. Potentially, this phenomenon is being studied by multiple agencies in secret with no oversight.
Special access programs with counter intelligence may effectively stove pipe information from the public, potential enemies and other agencies but the question must be asked, is this impending progress in the long term?
It has taken two years of acclimatisation for the public to understand the position of why certain decisions were made by DOD in the best interest of the Western powers. But, if you walk back AATIP, you walk back the understanding and trust which has been delicately built between the Pentagon and the people.
.