If you want to start a thread about alternatives to science,
I know I should be done with this thread.
and I want to be
but how is questioning reality,
then testing it not the scientific method ?
seems as if you have lost your fundamentals.
maybe go read the idea of the scientific method and get back to us
--------------------
also, the idea that math is not reality has been presented to you many times in this thread
you never address this when it threatens your math (not to be confused with logic, a larger topic that contains math)
-----------------------
also the comment of "put up or shut up"
you only accept what you have been taught. (that is called schooling, learning is something else entirely)
you have been presented with all kinds of ideas here.
you only accept the ones that suit you.
now I get that.
now why has there not been any evidence as to how inertia can be messed with,
from your point of view, it is because all of it was removed from your schooling
from other points of view, how about the electrostatic charge of a pendulum inside a faraday cage of the same potential ?
that is just one of many
when you hide from anomalies you don't figure things out.
when you go look at them, you find reality.
you started early in this thread with seemingly being annoyed with people that have never studied relativity (and potentially quantum physics, but I forget if you took issue with that)
you seem to have abandon that as of late
I studied it in great detail.
reading this thread it is clear you pick and choose what you reply to,
you pose ideas like someone that is skilled in rhetoric
a winning thing if running for public office, but clearly not someone seeking the truth.
go pick the hard points, reply to them.
like the idea that any simple math is unlikely to predict reality, or more critically so, if you have even one anomaly, you are sure your math is wrong.
and past all that,
I give you an anomaly free version of physics, and you reply with the idea that it could take years to figure it out.
you might be correct,
but you gave no hint that you even read it once (takes a few hours)
much less taking notes and really trying to figure it out (takes a few days)
in some way I do admire your point of view,
you have everything figured out, must be a very comfortable place to be.
makes sense that you would defend that point of view so much.
you asked about hardware a while back
go look at that pendulum at high voltage first,
assuming you don't debunk it (for anyone that is not paying attention, debunking is an emotional attack on logic. disproof is quite another thing) I have more hardware to share if you are actually interested (but schooling dictates that you pretend to care long enough to figure out how to ignore it, if you were actually learning and testing the ideas, seems you would have said other things)
you should embrace the scientific method and stop defending your math so much.
(I fully expect you to pick apart the ideas presented here into sentences, possibly even words, after all, if you disprove a word here, the entire thing must be wrong.)