Is a UFO non disclosure policy becoming a very dangerous option?

ChrisIB

Honorable
If some countries have both the knowledge of UFO activity and non disclosure policies, then is not the likelihood of an accidental nuclear strike being initiated by UFO events getting more and more likely? Especially as we transition towards an era of automated weaponry and less stable nuclear capable countries.

In 1995, then-Russian president Boris Yeltsin had his finger on the button, because the Russians had detected a missile launched from Norway, which they assumed to be American. Russian officials determined just in time that it was not a nuclear missile.

Special Report - Nuclear strategists call for bold move: scrap ICBM ar

The old argument that society is not ready for disclosure seems more and more outdated indulgence.
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
I'm not sure what disclosure has to do with the military being prepared for nuclear strikes.

Expecting disclosure is a waste of time......its easier to find the answers yourself. Its lazy to expect people to tell you and do your work for you......besides no one would believe them anyway as they haven't in the past.
 

michael59

Celestial
If some countries have both the knowledge of UFO activity and non disclosure policies, then is not the likelihood of an accidental nuclear strike being initiated by UFO events getting more and more likely? Especially as we transition towards an era of automated weaponry and less stable nuclear capable countries.



Special Report - Nuclear strategists call for bold move: scrap ICBM ar

The old argument that society is not ready for disclosure seems more and more outdated indulgence.

I'm not so sure ET would allow it to happen, ChrisIB.

Aliens have deactivated British and US nuclear missiles, say US military pilots

IMHO, governments keeping these type of secrets is always a bad idea. It leaves to much room for grooming deceit in the ranks.

I'm pretty sure that we, the people, have never entered the election ballad booth thinking....

*Okay, we need to vote for this person because he/she will only keep us informed about the good things done in our name.

We must elect someone that is willing to do whatever is necessary to keep us safe and secure even if it will destroy society as we know it. Without informing us of the dangers, of course, because if they don't keep the scary stuff a secret, we won't be able to sleep at night.
* :mail1:
 

August

Metanoia
" because if they don't keep the scary stuff a secret, we won't be able to sleep at night."

This is very true imagine how many people will lose sleep and become anxious and afraid if they do know Aliens and UFO crafts are coming here , and we can't ( or won't ) do anything to stop it.
 

michael59

Celestial
" because if they don't keep the scary stuff a secret, we won't be able to sleep at night."

This is very true imagine how many people will lose sleep and become anxious and afraid if they do know Aliens and UFO crafts are coming here , and we can't ( or won't ) do anything to stop it.

I was being sarcastic when saying that, August.

I can certainly imagine how many people will lose sleep and become anxious and afraid. Been there. Done that.

I think the short answer is that like any traumatic event in life, we go through stages.


The experience of anxiety involves nervous system arousal. If your nervous system is not aroused, you cannot experience anxiety. Understandably, but unfortunately, most people attempt to cope with feelings of anxiety by avoiding situations or objects that elicit the feelings. Avoidance, however, prevents your nervous system from habituating. Therefore, avoidance guarantees that the feared object or situation will remain novel, and hence arousing, and hence anxiety provoking. Moreover, avoidance tends to generalize over time. If you avoid the elevator at work, you will soon begin to avoid all elevators, and then all buildings that house elevators, etcetera. Soon enough, you'll be living in a prison of avoidance.

Moreover, when you avoid something that scares you, you tend to experience a sense of failure. Every time you avoid a feared object or situation, your anxiety gains strength while you lose some. Every time you avoid the feared object or situation, you accumulate another experience of failure and another piece of evidence attesting to your weakness. Finally, avoidance eliminates practice. Without practice it is difficult to gain mastery. Without mastery, confidence is less likely to rise.

So, avoiding anxiety maintains and magnifies it. To get rid of your anxiety you should instead capitalize on the principle of habituation through the use of "exposure." Exposure is by far the most potent medicine known to psychology. It is responsible, directly or indirectly, for most positive improvement achieved in therapy--any therapy, but particularly the treatment of anxiety. Exposure entails facing your fears, which makes it aversive in the short-term. But many worthy long-term goals entail short-term discomfort (think studying for an exam). Exposure also seems counter intuitive, but many truths are counter intuitive (think about the fact that we're residing on a ball floating in infinite space). Exposure scares people, but scary things are not necessarily dangerous (think roller coasters, horror films). Exposure is scary primarily because most people, lacking an understanding of the habituation principle, expect their fear to escalate indefinitely in the presence of a feared object or situation. But nothing rises indefinitely. And fear, if you face it, will soon begin to subside as you habituate.
Overcoming Fear: The Only Way Out is Through

As much as I would like it to be true. Denial is never the answer.:give_rose:
 

August

Metanoia
Well if they continue to give us all snippets of info like official USA forces film clips people will soon get the message that something is rotten in Denmark. :give_rose:
 

ChrisIB

Honorable
I'm not so sure ET would allow it to happen, ChrisIB.

Not sure, they let us conduct 100s of atmospheric nuclear tests (so contaminating we need to use low-background steel from ships sunk prior to 1945 for things like high sensitivity medical testing devices).
Also whilst if they have the technology to come here, they have the technology to do anything, I believe there will be alien groups that squabble politically.

The rationale for non disclosure in the 50s would I guess be totally different to that of the 80s and again to that in the planet spotting internet era. The Reuters article I linked, in essence says the US gets about 30mins warning of a missile strike. That gives the President about 10 minutes decision time. He or she has three types of nuclear weapons with which to respond, aircraft, submarine and land based missiles.
Many American military now think the land based option should be removed as it is outdated and very expensive (1.4 trillion to update!).
But the real kicker is unlike air and submarine launched missiles they cannot be ordered to self destruct after the button has been pressed.
So, not only unnecessary but consider just how much power and influence that 1.4 trillion will give to the people behind the weapons industry.

So far regarding nuclear weapons we've been lucky, luck does not last forever.
 

ImmortalLegend527

The Messenger Of All Gods old and new
If some countries have both the knowledge of UFO activity and non disclosure policies, then is not the likelihood of an accidental nuclear strike being initiated by UFO events getting more and more likely? Especially as we transition towards an era of automated weaponry and less stable nuclear capable countries.



Special Report - Nuclear strategists call for bold move: scrap ICBM ar

The old argument that society is not ready for disclosure seems more and more outdated indulgence.
Every country thats a country all have signed a treaty never to disclose information on this subject.
 

ChrisIB

Honorable
I think because of the cold war both Russian and US defence spending became disproportionate and that in both countries there are still large power bases centred on the arms industries. The recent warnings by tech luminaries may be prescient, it's a situation that will lead to the rapid weaponization of AI

Perhaps on many worlds such events subvert democracy leading to a surfeit of militarized civilizations out there.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Perhaps on many worlds such events subvert democracy leading to a surfeit of militarized civilizations out there.

I think there's a wide range of civilizations out there, even many very militarized and conquering types which is why I believe it's very dangerous to broadcast our presence out into space, so far we haven't had any conquering aliens come along but that could change if we don't be careful...
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
I think there's a wide range of civilizations out there, even many very militarized and conquering types which is why I believe it's very dangerous to broadcast our presence out into space, so far we haven't had any conquering aliens come along but that could change if we don't be careful...

Its a bit to late to worry now.....they won't hear us if they are hundreds of light years anyway.
 
Top