The shadow
The shadow knows!
I lost all respect for LMH when she declared the nazca mummy to be genuine. but that is a story for a different day
Didn't know about that, but then I have pretty well been ignoring that end of the realm. In any case, it does not surprise me. Pretty sad though. Right up there with Knapp's idiotic blather about Lazar still having a stash of his imaginary substance.I lost all respect for LMH when she declared the nazca mummy to be genuine. but that is a story for a different day
He's offered nothing in the form of verification, so it's just a guy saying things. I find it Very difficult to believe that some military research project leap-frogged ahead of all terrestrial physics and technology to the tune of a few centuries (at least), with no indications of the long and arduous process of discovery...development...and ultimately perfection of a form of technology totally alien to global civilization as we know it. If the Tic-Tac is human tech, then we have the capability to colonize other star systems right now....but instead of doing that, we're buzzing unsuspecting Navy battle groups with it...hmmm.
And even a cursory look into this guy throws up all kinds of red flags:
Mike Turber - facebook profile
Mike Turber
He calls himself "Editor-in-Chief" of "5X5 News," which is an awful YouTube channel with 267 subscribers:
5X5 NEWS YouTube channel
5X5 NEWS
Here's his latest "news segment" at his "5X5 News" YouTube channel - so awful...:
5X5 NEWS | Exclusive RAW Video | Aliens Launch Attack On Las Vegas!
Here's his Twitter account:
Mike Turber (74 followers)
Mike Turber (@Michaelturber) | Twitter
Here's his LinkedIn profile (WOW, Inc. no longer exists, and only had 4 followers when it folded):
Mike Turber CEO / President at WOW, INC. (not to be confused with "World of Warcraft" : )
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mike-turber-082342b/
So it seems to me that this guy is a nobody, who knows nothing more than we know, and he loves to adopt serious-sounding titles like "Editor-in-Chief" and "CEO/President" when he launches dreary little vanity projects that quickly wither on the vine. Claims are easy, but evidence is what counts. As a "news man" he should know this, haha.
Besides, how seriously would you take this guy after finding this featured public pic on his facebook page?
View attachment 8444
I love the bad tattoo.
My reply to anyone contemplating a tattoo, tattoos are forever. Get it right the first time. You do not want to have someone try and remove those dyes.lots of bad ink out there. this guy can get in line with those who got bar codes and binary
Is gravitation field propulsion with anti gravity when near the planet surface a better fit to observation?According to one UFO propulsion theory, that I take seriously, UFOs can only reduce gravitational and inertial forces to zero, but they can not actually bend space-time. That means that UFOs still need to use reactive propulsion and 'launch' themselves on ballistic trajectories. There is actually a strange bias in timing of UFO events, that UFO arrivals coincide with phases of the Moon.
What do you think of Randall's speculation that the Tic-Tac may have been a combination of holographic and radar spoofing technologies, and not a physical craft at all? In support of this notion he notes that personnel were at the ready to collect the data storage devices, as though they knew before hand that a sighting would occur. Also, the Tic-Tac appeared to know where the naval jets would rendezvous, which again implies prior knowledge.I think we could all better understand the significance of the stunning performance characteristics of the Tic-Tac objects reported in the USS Nimitz CSG incidents by looking at a quick analysis of their interstellar spaceflight capabilities. So I crunched the numbers to demonstrate the transit times to other stars based solely on the reported observations by Kevin Day.
Kevin Day reported observing the objects on his radar screen drifting southward at only 100 knots, but when approached by our military interceptor jets, they dropped from 28,000 feet in altitude down to about 50 feet above the surface of the ocean in .78 second. That gives an average speed of 24,431.8 mph (Mach 31.84), but that’s not actually what’s important.
The important part is the rate of acceleration. In order to hop across more than five miles of distance in .78 second and come to a dead stop at the end of that transit time, a Tic-Tac would have to undergo a minimum acceleration of 56010.26 m/s^2, which is 5711.46 g’s. It may have accelerated at a much higher rate if it reached a cruising speed quickly, and maintained it for a moment, before decelerating in order to come to a stop; but we don’t have such details, so we’ll work with the minimum acceleration demonstrated by his observations.
At that rate of acceleration, a Tic-Tac could travel from the Earth to Alpha Centauri – and arrive at a stop in order to plant a flag or take photos, in only 19.86 days. Most folks think that this would be impossible because we’ve been told that it’s impossible to travel faster than the speed of light. But that was before we learned about gravitational field propulsion – the only known form of reactionless propulsion, which the Tic-Tacs clearly exhibited. There is no upper limit to transit speed using this method. There are also no subjective g-forces for occupants within such a craft. And there’s no relativistic time dilation because, technically, the craft and occupants remain at rest with respect to their accelerating reference frame. We could debate these points but they’ve already been worked out in peer-reviewed academic theoretical physics papers.
So here’s where it gets really interesting. Transit at a constant acceleration changes our relationship to distances; you can think of it this way – constant acceleration compresses distances exponentially, so it actually takes the most time to travel short distances, and smaller and smaller increments of additional transit time to cover larger distances. Let’s look at an example. Bear in mind that it took 19.86 days to arrive at a dead stop at Alpha Centauri, which is 4.367 light-years away from us.
How long would it take, at the same minimum rate of acceleration observed by Kevin Day, to travel ten times as far away – to travel 43.67 light-years and arrive at a dead stop? It would take 62.87 days of travel time. For comparison the Mayflower sailed from Plymouth, England to Cape Cod in 66 days.
There are over 660 star systems within 40 light-years of the Earth. Astronomers estimate that about 2% of all stars in the Milky Way are Sun-like stars which are orbited by Earth-like planets in the habitable zone, so we can expect to find at least 13 ideal candidates for habitability within 62.87 days of transit time, if we humans had Tic-Tac AAV performance capabilities.
Unlike some folks, I don’t think that any secret military program on Earth has achieved anything even remotely akin to Tic-Tac performance capabilities, but perhaps now you can see why I think that it’s a goal that’s well worth our effort to achieve.
I'm not really sure if you're responding to me, or what you're saying here.Well, admittedly the performance characteristics of whatever we've been shown is startling and unfamiliar to say the least- but by the Navy's own admission nobody claims to know what the hell they are. To extrapolate what they might be is an interesting exercise but as I've said, maybe those things just aren't what we think they are and the calculations are based on some fundamental error.
Honestly I think that line of speculation is grasping at straws. Let's go through it.What do you think of Randall's speculation that the Tic-Tac may have been a combination of holographic and radar spoofing technologies, and not a physical craft at all? In support of this notion he notes that personnel were at the ready to collect the data storage devices, as though they knew before hand that a sighting would occur. Also, the Tic-Tac appeared to know where the naval jets would rendezvous, which again implies prior knowledge.
I may have a couple of details slightly wrong, but I think have the gist of speculation right.
So Project Blue Beam is fantasy?It's impossible to make a holographic projection in free space
Apparently the answer is "yes":So Project Blue Beam is fantasy?
In this interview, Linda Moulton Howe gives a detailed history of the metamaterials that TTSA is having tested by the US Army.
I'm not really sure if you're responding to me
eyewitness accounts are the justification for research not conclusions by themselves.