Unexplained Cattle Mutilations Near Grand Canyon

nivek

As Above So Below
Unexplained Cattle Mutilations Reported Near Grand Canyon

Arizona rancher John Mahan discovered a cow and a bull mysteriously killed and mutilated on his property near the Grand Canyon. Both animals had organs removed including their reproductive organs, and both were drained of blood. Curiously, as in similar cases of unexplained cattle mutilations, there were no tracks and very little blood found around the animals’ carcasses

Who could have done this to these cows?
I thought they’d been shot. I didn’t realize what had happened. There were parts missing — they were mutilated.
I just assumed they had been shot. I didn’t realize what had happened to them until the inspector showed me. They didn’t take any edible meat, just the genitals.
Why is it always the genitals?

In most of these cases, the sex organs of the animals are surgically removed, sometimes including the entire anal or vaginal cavity. Who – or what – would go to such lengths while leaving the other choice cuts of meat?

Arizona Livestock Inspector Royal Reidhead examined the dead animals, and says he knew right away that something was amiss when he saw the carcasses. “These animals weren’t shot, these animals were mutilated,” Reidhead told Williams-Grand Canyon News, “They were basically killed for their body parts.” Even stranger, the animals’ carcasses weren’t touched by scavenger animals as they lay undiscovered for a week after their brutal mutilation.

Reidhead has seen several similar cattle mutilations in the Grand Canyon area of Arizona, and says that the wounds inflicted on the animals are always surgically precise and leave behind little blood. While Reidhead believes that poachers are mutilating these animals, I just have to wonder why someone would go to the lengths of surgically removing only a few organs and leaving the rest to rot in the sun. Again – why the genitals? Do people eat those?

cattle-mutilation2-640x457.jpg

Livestock mutilations remain one of the weirdest unexplained phenomena.

Even stranger, how could someone go about draining these animals’ blood and removing their organs without leaving as much as a single footprint or drop of blood?

As much as I try to remain skeptical about alien abductions and similar alleged phenomena, these cattle mutilations always leave me wondering what on Earth or off Earth is capable of such clean, precise surgeries with no discernible evidence.

But why would aliens be so interested in cow genitals?


.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
Nivek, are the words in italics yours or are you quoting somebody?

Italics are quotes, I prefer to post the entire article to read here instead of just a link, in case the article vanishes and easier to read here...

...
 

Sheltie

Fratty and out of touch.
No one has definitively proven that aliens are doing this yet none of the alternative theories hold water either. For years there has been speculation that this is the work of cults or poachers but none of these suspects could remove the body parts with such precision or speed, leaving behind no tracks.
 

wwkirk

Divine
No one has definitively proven that aliens are doing this yet none of the alternative theories hold water either. For years there has been speculation that this is the work of cults or poachers but none of these suspects could remove the body parts with such precision or speed, leaving behind no tracks.
How about a governmental agency testing for contaminants in the food chain?
If I'm not mistaken Chris O'Brien leans towards this explanation for many or most cases.
 

nivek

As Above So Below
How about a governmental agency testing for contaminants in the food chain?
If I'm not mistaken Chris O'Brien leans towards this explanation for many or most cases.

What sort of contaminates did Chris think were present?...

...
 

Sheltie

Fratty and out of touch.
It's my understanding from people like Linda Moulton Howe who've studied this that our medical technology has still not reached a level where it can remove organs so cleanly and neatly. I'm not a doctor or a medical expert but if the govt had such ability, why would it hide it from the general public?
 

wwkirk

Divine
It's my understanding from people like Linda Moulton Howe who've studied this that our medical technology has still not reached a level where it can remove organs so cleanly and neatly. I'm not a doctor or a medical expert but if the govt had such ability, why would it hide it from the general public?
It's common knowledge that military technology is decades ahead of civilian tech, so maybe this is just an example of that.

As for concealing their involvement in the mutilations, it's clear that they wouldn't want to be found out destroying private property.
 

Spader

i think I’ll sing.
It's my understanding from people like Linda Moulton Howe who've studied this that our medical technology has still not reached a level where it can remove organs so cleanly and neatly. I'm not a doctor or a medical expert but if the govt had such ability, why would it hide it from the general public?

When one is able to tune out her constant regurgitation of her resume that she compulsively HAS to work into ANY interview she does, you come away with three conclusions.

a) she is a paid and accomplished disinformation agent
b) she is being used to the max to unwittingly spew out some highly speculative, fantastical disinformation.
c) whichever of the two above is correct, DIA, NIA, NSA, or the CIA, all seem to be in direct competition with one another as to who can feed her the most ridiculous story which she will dutifully report to the world at www.earthfiles.com

So at worst, she is a paid disinformation agent who has won an Emmy (sorry, regional Emmy) and at best she is so incredibly gullible you almost have to feel sorry for her.

I’m pretty sure if I dropped my car keys on the ground in front of her she would be confused for a week.
 

Dejan Corovic

As above, so bellow
a) she is a paid and accomplished disinformation agent
b) she is being used to the max to unwittingly spew out some highly speculative, fantastical disinformation.
c) whichever of the two above is correct, DIA, NIA, NSA, or the CIA, all seem to be in direct competition with one another as to who can feed her the most ridiculous story which she will dutifully report to the

I beg to differ. Linda went through two phases. First, she was brilliant rational and evidence based researcher that attracted big audience and had huge influence. Her methodical approach was possibly bringing her close to the truth.

Phase two. Her success attracted some unwanted attention. If anything Linda doesn't in slighest leave impression of galable person. More likely that she was threatened and she switched to loony side under pressure.
 
Top