CasualBystander
Celestial
Baby steps then lol...
...
Anyway they are firing neutrons at what should be an impenetrable wall and measuring neutrons on the other side.
If they find neutrons, the neutrons took a short cut.
Baby steps then lol...
...
Anyway they are firing neutrons at what should be an impenetrable wall and measuring neutrons on the other side.
If they find neutrons, the neutrons took a short cut.
This is the lead researcher:So they're knocking on a wall in the dark hoping to find a window or door to climb in?...
...
I thought the earth was sick...not them?They could be under orders to find a suitable parallel earth to colonize or take over since we are ruining our planet currently...
...
They could be under orders to find a suitable parallel earth to colonize or take over since we are ruining our planet currently...
...
Duplicate Cheque Incident | Parallel Time Line Anomaly
"This account from Rob Freeman rates in my opinion as one of the top 10 apport stories in history. It is a double wow. I am pleased that he is allowing me to tell it in my new book "Weird: The Paranormal world of Manifestations and Apports" - Grant Cameron (UFO Researcher/Author)
**2017 ‘Duplicate’ Cheque Incident**
In late February 2017, the Making Contact Team went to Australia. Before leaving home, one of our team members wrote a check to pay for rent. This check was scheduled to be given to the landlord during our absence. On March 1st, it was provided to the landlord. As well, full verification was made online that the check had been physically given to a bank official and subsequently processed. Upon returning from the expedition it was discovered that the original check still remained in the check book. This blew our minds! All banking institutions were visited and the bank scan was compared to the original check that was still in the check book. Through the banking process the only modification to the front of the check was that the apartment number had been written on the bottom right hand corner, by the landlord. As well, on the back, there were wet stamps done by the banking official on the day of the physical delivery of the check. We also had a forensics expert verify that the remaining physical check is an identical match to the check that went through the system. Upon further research our only theory is that two parallel time lines have formed. High (but cool!) strangeness!
.
Here's the deal.
Logic dictates that one cannot prove a negative, for example, one can't say with 100% certainty that parallel universes aren't real.
One the other hand, there's zero empirical evidence to indicate that parallel universes are real.
So while it's amusing to consider the possibilities, i.e. "what if?" - it remains unscientific and irrational to actually believe in the existence of parallel universes until we have some compelling empirical reason to do so.
I looked at that "mysterious duplicate check" video and it remains vastly more likely that some prosaic explanation applies; for example, the bank statement was either Photoshopped or the woman wrote out two very similar copies of the same check in her checkbook and only put one into the drawer. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - and the claim that we're adrift in a multiverse and somehow casually drift from one to the other without noticing (until a duplicate check seems to appear magically) does not constitute "extraordinary evidence" because one check was apparently destroyed so the two can't ever be compared. Without a scientific comparison of the two checks side by side, all we have is a story, and a story doesn't constitute empirical evidence.
Hypothesis is good. But it's meaningless without empirical evidence.To be fair though, The same thing could have been said about any scientific discovery before empirical evidence became available though. I mean, Black holes were only a fantasy in 1947. I like you, Thomas I always have, you know that. But, You lean so hard on Empirical evidence. It leaves so little room for Hypothesis. An important part of the process brother.
That's different though; the "dream of flying" is an ambition, not a hypothesis about the nature of physical reality. If you have the ambition to fly then you could eventually figure out a way to do it. But having an ambition to live in a manifold of accessible parallel realities can't ever make it happen; it's either real or it isn't. And we have absolutely no credible reason at all to think that parallel realities are real.I think What I am trying to say is Before man could fly, He dreamed he could fly, And now we can fly at eight times the speed of sound., That dreaming part is important in creation and development.
The recent Joe Rogan interview (show 1428) with physicist Brian Greene was most interesting. He does make mention of parallel universes where you and I could have a doppelgänger in another universe. I didn’t understand a great deal of the discussion but it is good to listen to such programs and try and stretch your understanding of such matters.
I know we got the latest threat and I wonder if we can defeat the peril from China.I don't buy this argument - it was probably dreamed up by the Brookings Institute as propaganda to dissuade the intelligence services from going public about the topic.
In fact I find the whole basis of this argument revolting - it paints human beings as simpering infants who can't handle any revelation which reshapes their perspective on life.
But time and time again we've proven our fortitude for jarring revelations.
Before we had any means of defense, we learned that an asteroid could wipe out all life on Earth. Nobody panicked.
We faced the AIDS epidemic, and SARS, and the swine flu and the bird flu. No nation toppled.
We endured the threat of instant nuclear annihilation for the decades of the Cold War. Still we stood strong.
We saw fascism sweep through Europe and overcome nearly all of our closest allies. We rose up and defeated it.
The (painfully obvious) revelation that we're not alone in the universe, and we're not the most advanced species in the galaxy, would at best inspire a yawn from most people. In fact I bet that most people already assume these things to be true. As long as it doesn't interrupt the Sunday football game, most people could care less if the government finally admits that UFOs are making a mockery of our air defenses on a fairly regular basis. The real reason that most people never bother to look up into the sky, is that they don't care what's up there - it has no impact on their daily lives. So unless UFOs start landing in our football stadiums during a game, most people won't care what the government has to say about it one way or the other.