Dejan Corovic
As above, so bellow
specifically in my referenced to the shock Travis Walton got that they apparently felt the responsibility to revive him from.
I ignored Travis Walton case because it is statistically insignificant. Just in combined databases of all UFO research groups, like MUFON, NICAP, NUFORC etc. there is about 150,000 cases. I extensively collected physical effects and that is the only case I know off that had something looking like electrical discharge. Travis did jump out of the truck and made unexpected move closer to UFO hovering at a treetop level. In most cases people run away from UFOs.
UFO at a treetop level can obviously afford at least one order of magnitude higher voltage than UFO hovering 3 ft above ground. Treetop level is approximately same as power-lines sagging on hot summer day, so at least same voltage as power-lines or 500 kV. So, as a ball park figure, we can say that UFO's pointed ledge is at about 500 kV. What fraction of g would that produce according to David's differential equation?
There was another case where UFO surprised a farmer working outside after dark. Again UFO was hovering at a treetop level and farmer made few strides towards the UFO. But than UFO pulled back to keep the same distance. Farmer did it once more and UFO pulled back once more. That case could easily be described with UFO being on high voltage.
As I explained above, based on omnipresence of pointed ledge on at least 90% of UFO descriptions, your GR solution is very important contributor to that technology.
As a matter of fact, if one was to analyze large number of UFO witness testimonials, he would find extremely frequent description of one particular UFO movement. Sometimes ufos hover just few feet above ground or even land on some kind of legs. But after that, they almost always rise very slowly to 7m 21ft. Description of that maneuver repeats from one case to another so many times. Once at that height, they just hover there shortly, not longer than a minute, and than they bolt of at very high speed. I am sure I can dig up 100 cases with that exact description. That maneuver is so well correlated with a high voltage around the sharp ledge most of them have.
I am digressing a bit, but another typical movement of UFOs is that, in at least 50% of cases, they depart at an angle of approximately 45 deg. That as well is a sign of some underlying physical limitations, but I don't know what that would be.
As for other technology, than that would mean other GR solutions are possible?
I think that AAVs represent an engineering application of GR that, as far as I know, is far beyond human capabilities (but if David's right then I may have to reconsider that last point).
I agree with David, and that's what I was saying all the time. You are reasoning like a quasi educated journalist with degree in humanities. UFOs can fool non-technical folks, but for scientist/engineer there are tons of practical and very exciting clues, that shouldn't be there in a first place. It's just a question of putting it all together and having a good scientificly based explanation, like with Waite-Papapetrou,-Majumdar's GR solution.
If I just knew how to calculate those differential equations we'll have much better idea.
Last edited: