i think he is credible, his problem is that he focus too much on cases that have become beyond dead horsesHonestly, I had never given much thought to Nick Pope, despite the fact that he pops up on nearly every UFO-related program on television.
I checked several reference sites, including Wiki and IMDB. I was not aware that, despite his longtime status of being retired from the MOD, he is only 52. Also, his mini bio description on IMDB refers to him as "the world's leading expert on UFOs" (big shoes to fill indeed).
While certainly not reaching the Bob Lazar depths of murkiness, I can see how one might be inclined to question some of his motives. Framing Pope as a nefarious disinformation agent, however, is too much of a stretch for my thinking.
What would you say if I told you the UFOs are here for fuel. They are after our water.
i think he is credible, his problem is that he focus too much on cases that have become beyond dead horses
yep, looks like it lol!I would say you'v been binge watching the V 80s tv series too long?
i look at him with similar eyes, he never brings anything new to the table, just remdlesham and remdleshamI think he's the British PR guy "managing" their UFO file. "Maybe they exist maybe don't don't, we don't really know anything" type of "investigator". PR Guy.
Maybe he will become the J. Allen Hynek of Britain and put the dots together.
I agree. He doesn't seem to do any legwork -- he just talks about what everyone is talking about.i look at him with similar eyes, he never brings anything new to the table, just remdlesham and remdlesham
Hi guys, this might be considered a little off-topic on this 'actual photo thread' ... so apologies to start with, but for a very long time I've been interested to the point of near fascination in the much talked about "Nick Pope missing photo".
You are being redirected...
...and yes, this picture is only a artist interpretation of what is claimed to be the original [as Nick himself states that it is so close... it could be termed a facsimile .. if true?]
Well, I say that i'm very interested in the picture and surrounding story but in all truth, whether genuine UFO or not ... just like all the other good images with great provenances ... it would never be heralded as 'the smoking gun' because of course no-one [either proponent nor disbeliever] could deep down accept fully 100% that it was the holy grail that we all crave without actually being their when the photo was taken. ... And yes the picture does look impressive, but then i'm sure that we have all seen those clever fakes that abound our reading matter and clutter the www. that are just as striking. The story that accompanies the picture too .. has the required authenticity. .. "The two guys just happening across the surreal sight, taking a snap and sending it to a local newspaper before it reached the relevant MOD office where it was examined and declared to be a genuine UFO"... Even the declaration that " it's not the Americans and not the Russians, therefore points upwards toward ET-land".. plus the "hanging in the 'Mulder-and-Scully-office before being made to disappear on orders from the top' is entirely feasible to me at least.
..... But then the thing that actually fascinates me about 'this claim', is that even now... 28 years after the fact, when the facsimile-picture and Nick Pope's constant retelling of this story on a myriad of web-sites , TV shows and at all of his convention appearances .... [aka , .. the massive publicity it has enjoyed over the years!] ... none of the main protagonists in this 'potentially earth shattering event' has ever come forward to support good old Nick's story.??... No, not either of the two actual photo-snapping-witnesses, or even any of the normally-un-shy guys from Scottish Daily Record. .... Surely we are not supposed to believe that they have been covertly shut-up by the mib , when Nick himself is constantly shouting about it to all that will listen at every opportunity that he gets?... I don't think so!
Which is the reason that I find something decidedly iffy about this whole 'Nick Pope Claim' , and thereby association to this flag raising anomaly ... I personally have doubts about Nick Pope himself, and his true motivation for his total mmersment in the ETH/ufological genre. Is it solely for the fame and fortune? ... or could it be a lot more nefarious than that, ie one of those dastardly furtive disinformation agents?
.... Mmm? i'm not sure, what do you guys think? ... is the story and the picture real? ... and is Nick Pope for real??
Cheers.
exactly, remdlesham is a dead horse to meI agree. He doesn't seem to do any legwork -- he just talks about what everyone is talking about.
at least nick pope is more or less telling the truth, bob lazar isntNick Pope reminds me of a British version of Bob Lazar. He'd make a good used car salesman.
at least nick pope is more or less telling the truth, bob lazar isnt
dont think so, he is just really boringYour sure about that are you ? He is ex MoD they are not going to let him get away with giving out UFO info. He maybe just a stooge or a Government plant sent out to deceive true believers.