You can make a distinction between articles from NASA and from people working with NASA. The article you provided is signed by:
Erica Hupp
Headquarters, Washington
Steve Roy
Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala.
Megan Watzke
Chandra X-ray Center, Cambridge, Mass.
The article I provided in my post above is an OFFICIAL
'mission statement' in the tab called
'WHAT WE STUDY'. It is not contextual, about a specific observation, but generalities about what NASA endorses.
No, we do not disagree on dark matter. You were wrong, I was right. Dark matter IS NOT PROVED, unlike what you contantly said it. Honesty is the very first virtue of a true Christian, what you repeatedly say you were. So, you failed being a true Christian.
You didn't find any specific peer-reviewed articles on the fractal time because it is not the words scientists use to speak about it without naming it. NAMING IT, and DEFINING IT, is what I brought to science. I won't provide you with articles that you couldn't understand the math.
You are confusing many things here, blatantly showing your lacks in science. Relativity is confirmed because measured. Entropy is confirmed because measured. Both are scientific concepts with precise definitions. They are proven beyond doubt since they are defined beyond doubt.
The question is to what extent do we understand them and are measurable.
The dark matter case is the very opposite: NO ONE HAS EVER MEASURED IT. One only observes measurable effects that are SUPPOSED to be due to dark matter. BUT THERE IS NO MATERIAL DARK MATTER EVER MEASURED AND IDENTIFIED. Dark matter, unlike relativity and entropy, is not clearly defined (since not discovered yet, if ever found one day).
Again, you confuse effect and cause. There could be several causes (theories) for one single effect (measured observation). The measurement is NOT the theory. Other theories could explain the said effect. The fractal time is the best one, of the alternate explanations, until now since it doesn't only explain the gravitational lensing, but many other anomalies in the macrocosme and the microcosme. This is a unique concept the applications of which cover everything, including UFOs and paranormal (what the dark matter don't).
This is the other way around. You lose yourself into ramblings while I stick to the facts and assumptions (I separate them). Your example has nothing to do with the topic of dark matter and is perfectly explained due to scales changes of observations. Very different concepts.
So, now, to avoid to be wrong, you come back with your
'dark matter is real' when even NASA (nor ESA or other space agencies) doesn't dare to confirm or state this. You're just a believer in dark matter, like I already said in the first hand. It's your right to believe. But none has the least proof that dark matter, if any, exist, or is the only explanation on the shelve.
I have already disproved dark matter with a far better explanation, covering more in science than dark matter alone. But one needs true scientific education, and a high IQ level, to know and understand why. I provided a link to my book. But if you don't want to compare (if capable of), that's YOUR problem (that I really don't care about). Not those of the truth. Those who don't love the truth won't be saved...
2 Thessalonians 2:9-10
The coming of the lawless one will be accompanied by the working of Satan, with every kind of power, sign, and false wonder, and with every wicked deception directed against those who are perishing, because they refused the love of the truth that would have saved them.