Discussion in 'End Times & Conspiracies' started by Area201, May 9, 2018.
Won't release JFK files until Bush and Kissinger are long dead and then redacted. Useless.. but at least we can speak open about it.
Over 2 million views he got on this. Easily his most popular video.
Didin't talk much about the JFK assassination......and CE399 was actually heavily deformed and traveled in a straight line.
I was also going to point out the way this "person" was talking that he didn't know Nixon became president in January 1969.
This assassination was a conspiracy, why else would the files be held back for decades...
This image of a then 30 year old battleship wasn't declassified until 1983......so its not a surprise.
I used to think that way.
What's your rationale? It's hard to imagine the "logic" defending the official story.
You can point to discussion here elsewhere, but generally I used to think nothing of it - he was assassinated by Oswald. I would never think the U.S was being run from behind the scenes by the CIA and black project side of the military industrial complex, along with transnational corporations a consortium of untouchable "elite" ..in extension conspired to kill JFK, his brother, and - along the way faking false flags to go to war the norm - by mold of fascist Nazis - as Jim Marrs would say the "Fourth Reicht"
I always thought it was a conspiracy.......until I found out there was no magic in the bullet and that two bullets caused all the wounds. Seeing the alleged "magic" bullet shot reproduced helped that as well. Also witness reports watching or hearing the shots fired from the Depository.
It became clear that the three shots were fired from the school book depository.....and with the witness & finger print evidence it was enough to change my view about the conspiracy.
Can you point to this reproduction.. was it to do with using a watermelon (as JFKs head) in the re-enactment on a show years back? I was fooled by that for a while I remember myself
What reports? If these were actual reports, then you accept these but ignore every other witness reports supporting the second shooter and long list of cover up? What makes those reports supporting the official story more credible than all the other reports that were squashed?
The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew
Our suspicion (the Bright Insight Guy) is Papa Bush planted the magic bullet, later rewarded with Presidency and protected even to this day with the JFK files being withheld.
But he's believable. "Read my lips.. NO NEW TAXES" - Papa Bush
No.....it was using two anatomically correct "bodies" arranged in the same manner......I'll track it down when I can. This question does explain things for me.
Amos Euins witnessed the firing from his position on Houston Street. James Jarman, Bonnie Ray Williams and Harold Norman heard the shots from the 5th floor. I'm not sure who I'm supposedly ignoring......perhaps you could let me know.
85% of the witnesses heard three shots and most of the people heard shots fired from one location.....only 4 heard shots from two. I'm well aware that there are people that think a shot was fired from the grassy knoll and why they think so. I do not consider the witnesses who claim they saw "smoke" as credible as smokeless powder had been in use for decades.
What do you consider evidence of a cover-up
If you have to use the term "official story" that answers my question about your thoughts.
What do I call it when discussing this subject instead? Well yes, by doing so I am distinguishing it from any alternative explanations in discussion.. and you can deduce my thoughts from doing so, I guess. I've already declared them here also.
A conclusion.......that is based on evidence and observations. The conclusions I've reached are not based on the so called "official story"......but on evidence and observations.
Fair enough. I would counter argue they cherry picked evidence to the point the investigation was a sham.
I didn't cherry pick anything. So could you explain what I'm "cherry picking", who I'm supposedly ignoring and your supposed evidence of a cover-up.
There are no conclusions besides what the public has been told and the rest is cloaked in secrecy by the government...When ALL the evidence is presented and no longer classified, only then can anyone come to a reasonable and logical conclusion...
Actually I can reach a conclusion based on what is available......still don't even know what is being covered up or ignored.
I've been asking what was being covered up and who I was ignoring......and what I'm cherry picking.
Well no one knows because its still all classified, once the files are released we can see what they have been hiding and covering up...
Remember the picture I posted this morning about the damage to a 30 year old battleship being classified for over 40 years. The final disclosure for Roswell was even longer.
Each time there was still a question for national security......besides 95% of the previously classified material has been released.
I'll just reach my conclusions based on the evidence and observations and not on assumptions of what might be of importance that hasn't been released. If something comes out that proves to be of importance my conclusion will be updated.
Just based on witnesses, finger print evidence, physical evidence, ballistic evidence and recreations it is obvious to me that three shots were fired by oswald from the depository mortally wounding JFK and wounding Connelly.
Once I realized there was no magic in the bullet I changed my mind.
Been busy. Will get back with the official investigation cherry picking and being a sham - which you base your conclusion on.
Actually I don't......I was asking you what you think I was cherry picking and who I was ignoring.
Separate names with a comma.