I don't think this is a good idea, we don't know how a vaccine that was designed for humans will work in various species of animals...Worse case perhaps this interaction could give the virus a way to mutate in animals and become immune to our vaccines...
...
It said in the article that they are using a vaccine formulated for animals.I don't think this is a good idea, we don't know how a vaccine that was designed for humans will work in various species of animals...Worse case perhaps this interaction could give the virus a way to mutate in animals and become immune to our vaccines...
...
It said in the article that they are using a vaccine formulated for animals.
We have seen a rapid rise in new cases of the Indian variant, but new deaths are holding steady. I would expect that the number of people dying within 28 days of a positive test would go up, even for no other reason than that it is more likely now that people dying would have had SARS-CoV-2 recently due to its prevalence in the community, and even if it was not a cause of those deaths. It suggests that people dying (from all causes) either tend to have strong immunity, or are being effectively shielded in their last days from the virus.
The government has announced that it is not going to maintain the remaining Covid restrictions after the 19th of July, in spite of the growth of new cases. It looks like the government is trading international freedom for greater local freedom for Britons.
I wouldn't think so, no. As long as there are healthy people susceptible, then there must surely also be vulnerable people susceptible as well. Unless all the vulnerable population was placed in such a predicament to catch it ahead of those more resilient, which I don't think is the case. The vaccines are having an effect, but then there don't seem to be an increase in the numbers of 'breakthrough' infections resulting in death, either.Is it possible Covid has already hit most of the UK population that have preexisting conditions or weakened immune systems for one reason or another and the people being infected now have more robust immune systems and are healthier overall?...
In other words, perhaps Covid has ravaged through the weakest of your population and all that's left now are the healthier people who are fighting off the infection better than those early on...
I would prefer it. However, a lot of people complaining about the restrictions also complain about their inability to travel abroad, because it is an inconvenience to them, and also because it is devastating the travel industry. If the government removes local restrictions, then that is going to make foreign countries less willing to take British travellers without quarantine. So it seems that you can have more local freedom at the expense of international travel.Sounds like a logical trade-off, wouldn't British folk prefer to have their country open and back to normal with freedom of movement first and foremost?...I know I would...
In other words, perhaps Covid has ravaged through the weakest of your population and all that's left now are the healthier people who are fighting off the infection better than those early on...
I wouldn't think so, no. As long as there are healthy people susceptible, then there must surely also be vulnerable people susceptible as well. Unless all the vulnerable population was placed in such a predicament to catch it ahead of those more resilient, which I don't think is the case. The vaccines are having an effect, but then there don't seem to be an increase in the numbers of 'breakthrough' infections resulting in death, either.
However, a lot of people complaining about the restrictions also complain about their inability to travel abroad, because it is an inconvenience to them
The way I was looking at it is, let's say you have 50,000 people in a football stadium with a virus exposure spreading through them all...The virus would hit the weakest ones first, raising alarm bells and the healthier ones go into lockdown before they took are hit with infection...
...
Well sorry if I'm not sympathetic towards those crying in their milk because they can't travel out of the country on holiday but the whole world has been inconvenienced by Covid and many are dead because of it, they will get over it...
The trouble is that there are still plenty of older and more vulnerable people left. The first waves did not kill, or even infect, them all. Instead they infected a segment of each of the vulnerable and healthy populations somewhat randomly. The healthy population was not immune to infection, but was more resilient to serious illness and death.The thing is, the early forms of Covid went after the older people and those with preexisting conditions mainly, now it's been the various mutations that have targeted more younger and healthier people because the later mutations have become more robust, more infectious than before...
I'm glad our country has opened back up resembling normality again, however it comes at a price since less than 50 percent of the population in the US are fully vaccinated...I still wear a mask in most places I go to in public, not 100 percent masking wearing but I do wear it in larger crowd settings like the grocery store but not when I'm at a service station store getting gasoline...
The trouble is that there are still plenty of older and more vulnerable people left.