I didn't realise that Gene was quite so old - he's really got himself into a pitiable state hasn't he? I think by now everyone is aware of the extent and history of his long standing "grifting" campaign and should anybody now consent or fall for it then more fool them. His past misdemeanors (which I don't really want to go in to) are obviously never going to be repaid and so are very much "sunk costs" for those affected. I do see much point in pursuing them much further really.
I agree that Gene's situation is sad. I just retired and would not want to be in his position. Still, he is facing old age with more resources than many - and many have had true emergencies to deal with. There is a problem that goes beyond Gene.
But I think the past is relevant. As of last year, Gene was citing the story about his brother in law on facebook appeals and in places like the UFO Trail, maintaining that Stephen had died before he received an expected settlement that would have allowed him to repay Gene. That made no sense to me, so out of curiosity I decided to find out if Stephen had brought a legal action. I learned that rather than being the victim of a vengeful woman (as Gene had written), Stephen had been convicted after facing numerous theft and fraud charges.
I wrote to Gene about this not because I expected him to repay the people who had given him money under false pretenses, but because I believed that it was important for him to be honest about his past. Gene replied he had nothing to apologize for.
We later learned that Gene used the "settlement" to obtain $44,000 from James Torson, long after Biedny had written that it was nonexistent.
And now we continue to hear from Randall that Gene has never scammed anyone.
The past is relevant. It is not about repaying the victims, but about credibility. As a starting point, Gene should apologize even if he had somehow believed that the story he had written about Stephen was true.
By looking at court records, I also learned that Gene was soliciting for money while trying to maintain a luxury apartment and car payments - after putting almost $14,000 down on the car. Again, the past is relevant not because Gene will repay me and others who gave him money during this time, but because credibility is important.
Again, we hear from Randall that Gene has never scammed anyone.
It's not that I would deny Gene his "hobby horse" (as you call it) And I am not a hater and stalker (as Gene writes). Far from it, I have urged Gene to take steps that could get him out of his present cycle and lessen any emergency he feels - he could get immediate help and eventually be in a situation to make at least small repayments to a Torson even though his debt is legally discharged through bankruptcy.
Gene has refused to do so and instead we get regular appeals for more help - although both my wife and I have attempted to get off his emails.
It is a sad situation.