pigfarmer
tall, thin, irritable
i think he should put all the data in the public domain
That I agree with. Hoarding and hinting accomplishes nothing except to fuel a rumor mill
i think he should put all the data in the public domain
Yes, no matter what he has or thinks he has or doesn't have, that behavior only causes trouble.That I agree with. Hoarding and hinting accomplishes nothing except to fuel a rumor mill
Humanoidlord's job here is to undermine any promising avenue to understanding what we're dealing with, because his entire religious belief system about it mandates that it's incomprehensible by nature (the "cosmic trickster hypothesis"). That's why he posts 10,000 times per week - he has to beat down all of our efforts to get a better understanding of this phenomenon, and it's a lot of work because a lot of people are striving to make actual progress, and all of those efforts pose a direct threat to his cosmic trickster religion.
Here are the seven "Ray Stanford Close-Up" threads posted so far. Anyone with a question, comment, or suggestion that he or she does not wish to post in public, is welcome to send it to me via e-mail. My address is my first name, followed by a single underscore, followed by my last name, @protonmail-dot-com
1. Ray Stanford Close Up No. 1:
Ray Stanford and His Ever-Receding Claims of World-Shaking UFO Evidences
2. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 2:
Ray Stanford and His Super-Power-Inducing Time Machine (AKA "The Hilaron Accelerator")
3. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 3:
Ray Stanford's Instructions for Greeting the Occupants of the UFO That Would Land (1973)
4. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 4:
Ray Stanford and his NASA-Goddard UFO-Metal Cover-Up Claim (1964)
5. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 5:
Ray Stanford's Claim to Have a Piece of a Gigantic Intergalactic Spacecraft (Space Material)(1971)
6. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 6:
Ray Stanford Close-Up #6 - Audio Excerpts of Stanford Speaking & Channeling Aramda of "The Watchers"
7. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 7:
Ray Stanford Close-Up No.7: Claims the U.S. Air Force Offered to Scramble Jets at Stanford Requests
well how do i understand something wich i don't even know what it is, its so blurry and ambiguous that it could be anythingBetter to deflower it and move on than try to understand?...
...
i doubt it would be anything better than what we already have, but it still would be interestingYou'll get no argument from me about that - I'm a passionate advocate of transparency and the public sharing of all scientifically significant knowledge. And I also think that the survival of global civilization depends upon the kind of breakthrough technology that these devices represent, so there's a profound moral imperative to put his data out in the public domain so scientists can analyze it and if possible make use of it.
here's the golden rule: if various stories made by various people of all social categories contain similar elements wich they shouldn't know or contains reference to obscure mithology or occult symbolism, you know something is upWe have to take a lot on faith without more supporting evidence, granted. But this "selective skepticism" of yours is incredibly hypocritical, and obviously a debating tactic rather than a sincere argument. You seem to believe every cock-eyed fish tale about private lunch dates with aliens and other wild fantasies that sound more like folklore than reality - but you stand by them with zero supporting evidence because the crazier a story is, the more it seems to support your "magical quasidimensional trickster god" hypothesis. And here we have what appears to be credible empirical evidence of genuine scientific value, and suddenly you're playing the skeptic. Pick one: either be a skeptic, or be a dewy-eyed true believer. Because what you're doing now is pure hypocrisy, and flagrantly duplicitous.
the fact that he only wants selected people to see it is a HUGE red flag IMO, and i have no idea how a veteran ufologist like you can't see this obvious element of the storyIn any case, the potential importance of this data is far too significant to brush off without a closer look. That's one of the many reasons that I find Ray Stanford's covetous decision to keep his larger data set private so frustrating - we need to be able to vet and analyze this film footage, and he's not letting anyone do that.
now you are making fun of my posting quantity? have you ever heard of something called free speech?Humanoidlord's job here is to undermine any promising avenue to understanding what we're dealing with, because his entire religious belief system about it mandates that it's incomprehensible by nature (the "cosmic trickster hypothesis"). That's why he posts 10,000 times per week - he has to beat down all of our efforts to get a better understanding of this phenomenon, and it's a lot of work because a lot of people are striving to make actual progress, and all of those efforts pose a direct threat to his cosmic trickster religion.
nivek, i never mentioned anything related to the cosmic trickster here, why are you and thomas derailing the thread? i have already talked about all this, but its pretty clear that its a senseless battle, neither of us will change your beliefIndeed and a reflection of how these cosmic god theories about UFOs seem to be bringing humanity yet another new barbaric religion, as if this world needs that...
View attachment 6123
i don't belong to that crowdI find the religious aspects entering UFO conversation problematic, worst are usually coming from the "UFOs are demons" crowd. What a load of horseshit. We didnt survive the dark ages to go right back into them.
Here are the seven "Ray Stanford Close-Up" threads posted so far. Anyone with a question, comment, or suggestion that he or she does not wish to post in public, is welcome to send it to me via e-mail. My address is my first name, followed by a single underscore, followed by my last name, @protonmail-dot-com
1. Ray Stanford Close Up No. 1:
Ray Stanford and His Ever-Receding Claims of World-Shaking UFO Evidences
2. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 2:
Ray Stanford and His Super-Power-Inducing Time Machine (AKA "The Hilaron Accelerator")
3. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 3:
Ray Stanford's Instructions for Greeting the Occupants of the UFO That Would Land (1973)
4. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 4:
Ray Stanford and his NASA-Goddard UFO-Metal Cover-Up Claim (1964)
5. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 5:
Ray Stanford's Claim to Have a Piece of a Gigantic Intergalactic Spacecraft (Space Material)(1971)
6. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 6:
Ray Stanford Close-Up #6 - Audio Excerpts of Stanford Speaking & Channeling Aramda of "The Watchers"
7. Ray Stanford Close-Up No. 7:
Ray Stanford Close-Up No.7: Claims the U.S. Air Force Offered to Scramble Jets at Stanford Requests
A very disappointing read.
Although you found my posts "disappointing,"
How much time in a world would one need if he followed each rabbit hole?
That could easily be a timeless pursuit...
...
Just to disambiguate. I was disappointed in Standford not you. You've done a phenomenal job.
But you should had published these citations much earlier.
I accept information in a good fate. How much time in a world would one need if he followed each rabbit hole?