scientists confirm 2013-2017 as hottest period in recorded history

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
Technically that is not true. The iron/nickel/gold from the initial molten phase is in the core.

The iron/nickel/gold from asteroid collisions is still on the surface.

There is enough gold in the core to coat the surface of the earth with a layer 1 meter thick.
thanks for the correction
 

nivek

As Above So Below
i have seen what people claims to be "chemtrails" in my area, however to nobody surprise they are just persistent contrails

Exactly, nothing more than persistent contrails...
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
Yep, it's silly to think of it as anything more than that...
What the hell.

Among other things this is a conspiracy forum.

I'm going to have to look around and put together a chemtrails defense.

I'm amazed we don't have a local chemtrails enthusiast.
 

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
What the hell.

Among other things this is a conspiracy forum.

I'm going to have to look around and put together a chemtrails defense.

I'm amazed we don't have a local chemtrails enthusiast.
its because that like flat earth and the mandela effect its an dumb and flawed theory
 

Castle-Yankee54

Celestial
its because that like flat earth and the mandela effect its an dumb and flawed theory

The dumbasses also usually become spam trolls and get booted anyway......but they always seem to come in twos.

The last ones I remember at AU both got booted when they were constant spamming the same material. The fact one of the was a nazi wannabe didn't help their cause.
 

humanoidlord

ce3 researcher
The dumbasses also usually become spam trolls and get booted anyway......but they always seem to come in twos.

The last ones I remember at AU both got booted when they were constant spamming the same material. The fact one of the was a nazi wannabe didn't help their cause.
lol i joined too late to AU to see the lulz
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
But oh gee still shows a warming trend! Do you need a lesson in how to read these graphs?! Climate change is real buddy, live it, love it. No matter how much disinformation you try to spread guess what! IT'S STILL HAPPENING.

Caeldeth, I normally respect your opinion.

But as a government employee of some kind you have to sit in those stupid seminars where they brainwash you and you are grossly misinformed on some subjects.

I have an otherwise intelligent brother who was brainwashed into believing in global warming and illegal immigration as a government employee.

Both of these beliefs are flat out full blown nuts.

1. 40% of our food comes from more warmth and more CO2. A 60% growth increase since 1900. There is no chance in hell any negative that you can mention comes close to matching this benefit.

2. Tell me how much CO2 is warming the planet, exactly. It has been 40 years. You must have some clue? No?

The only study that I am aware of that even attempted to measure it came up with 0.2 W/m2 at two sites over 11 years for a 22 PPM increase. That is a quasi TSR measurement and should have been about 0.62 W/m2.

0.2 W/m2 for 22 PPM is about 1 W for the 110 PPM increase since 1900. That is 1/5- 1/3 of the warming.



Sad truth: the warming is mostly due to something else.

And given that the warming is virtually all beneficial, we wouldn't care if it was driven by CO2. CO2 is plant food.

At 460 PPM we will have doubled food production due to more CO2.
 

Caeldeth

Noble
Caeldeth, I normally respect your opinion.

But as a government employee of some kind you have to sit in those stupid seminars where they brainwash you and you are grossly misinformed on some subjects.

I have an otherwise intelligent brother who was brainwashed into believing in global warming and illegal immigration as a government employee.

Both of these beliefs are flat out full blown nuts.

1. 40% of our food comes from more warmth and more CO2. A 60% growth increase since 1900. There is no chance in hell any negative that you can mention comes close to matching this benefit.

2. Tell me how much CO2 is warming the planet, exactly. It has been 40 years. You must have some clue? No?

The only study that I am aware of that even attempted to measure it came up with 0.2 W/m2 at two sites over 11 years for a 22 PPM increase. That is a quasi TSR measurement and should have been about 0.62 W/m2.

0.2 W/m2 for 22 PPM is about 1 W for the 110 PPM increase since 1900. That is 1/5- 1/3 of the warming.



Sad truth: the warming is mostly due to something else.

And given that the warming is virtually all beneficial, we wouldn't care if it was driven by CO2. CO2 is plant food.

At 460 PPM we will have doubled food production due to more CO2.

I also respect your opinion my friend. But I've never had to sit though any of these seminars because I am in a completely different line of work. I also do not believe in global warming, I believe in climate change.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
I also respect your opinion my friend. But I've never had to sit though any of these seminars because I am in a completely different line of work. I also do not believe in global warming, I believe in climate change.

I believe in climate change.

I'm not sure we mean the same thing.

The deforestation at the equator is drying and heating an area that semi-arid in the absence of rainforests.

This is seen in how screwed up the climate is getting in parts of Brazil. The equator (especially rainforest areas) should see almost zero impact from more CO2.

The current desert areas are rapidly shrinking due to more CO2. It is hard to maintain deserts when CO2 is at its normal 1000 PPM and the closer to 1000 we get, the smaller the deserts.

9 Reasons To Get Hyped For 50 Years Of Global Cooling
But they are predicting 7% solar cooling so the next half century will get cooler.
 
Top