nivek
As Above So Below
Looks really interesting when he zooms in...That's not a helicopter...
View: https://youtu.be/DnILp5TnEuo
.
View: https://youtu.be/DnILp5TnEuo
.
UFO videos
- Thread starter humanoidlord
- Start date
- Copy link Copy link
nivek
As Above So Below
nivek
As Above So Below
nivek
As Above So Below
1963
Noble
I see that an awful lot of folk are declaring that the 'object/objects' in this video that shows what apparently seems to be the same "cigar-shaped" UFO ...[for the want of a better description] filmed in a host of different locations in South Africa, a couple of nights ago... is nothing but Elon Musk's renowned starlink satellite train ... but i'm not so sure about that?....
www.latest-ufo-sightings.net
... what do you guys think?
Cheers.
VIDEOS! Giant Cigar-Shaped UFO Spotted in Multiple Locations Across South Africa • Latest UFO Sightings, Recent Alien Sightings, UFO Recent Sightings
On January 19th, 2023, a mysterious cigar-shaped UFO was spotted in multiple locations across South Africa including Thohoyandou, Pretoria, Sandton, Bloemfontein, Bethlehem, Soweto, and Atlanta. The sighting was captured on video and reported by witnesses who described the object as having...
www.latest-ufo-sightings.net
... what do you guys think?
Cheers.
nivek
As Above So Below
Todd Feinman
tinyurl.com/4atm83v4tinyurl.com/yw38843m
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88s1Zu0KyGw
These pics were taken four hours drive from (my favorite historic account):
THE SHIP FROM THE STARS - Examiner (Launceston, Tas. : 1900 - 1954) - 9 Dec 1950
I WENT to Vienna a few weeks ago to speak to the great granddaughter of the ...
trove.nla.gov.au
nivek
As Above So Below
1963
Noble
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88s1Zu0KyGw
These pics were taken four hours drive from (my favorite historic account):
And the object also makes a musical noise. Very possibly the Sternenschiff again....
THE SHIP FROM THE STARS - Examiner (Launceston, Tas. : 1900 - 1954) - 9 Dec 1950
I WENT to Vienna a few weeks ago to speak to the great granddaughter of the ...
Hi Todd, thanks for that link, I love the "Professor Karl Schneider" article... it was new to me and fascinatingly authentic.
... I am of course familiar with the 'Rudi Nagora' pictures from a hundred and twenty years later [1971] .. they have always been some of "the real-deal" in my eyes and have never been anywhere near debunked. [which begs the question of why aren't they acceptable as being solid evidence?] ... here is the perfect example of evidence that has been presented by a respectable witness, carefully and scientifically examined by several different professional agencies , and deemed to be "100 % Authentic" ... and then duly ignored as being 'tangible evidence'! [perhaps one of those self proclaimed 'critical-thinkers' can pop up and explain to us simple folk ... why?] ... here's what our old mate Richard Haines said after his team's exhaustive analysis of the pictures....
An Analysis of Multiple UAP Photographic Images
(May 23, 1971, Austrian Alps)
Richard F. Haines
ABSTRACT: This paper presents an analysis of 11 consecutive color photographs and related eyewitness testimony of an alleged unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) taken over at least a 10 minute period beginning at about 12:30 p.m. on May 23, 1971, about 30 miles south-southwest of Graz, Austria, by Mr. Rudi Nagora, 25. Details of the camera, lens, film characteristics, and other relevant optical and historical details are presented. Each frame shows a dark and/or “metallic” object in the daytime sky. Its flight path was determined on several adjacent frames by overlapping relatively unchanging cloud and fixed background details. No evidence of pixel distortion is found surrounding any image of the object as might be produced by radiated heat, nor is there evidence of double exposure, a suspension thread above the UAP images, or mismatch of pixel dimensions within the UAP image or outside it. There is evidence of finite object motion blur in some frames where stationary background detail is in focus. A geometric composite analysis of all images supports the view that the UAP’s three-dimensional form is not circular in planform but rather a blunt-cornered isosceles triangle with flat bottom and convex upper surface. The object remains unidentified at this time.
Cheers Buddy.
Fix this
nivek
As Above So Below
pigfarmer
tall, thin, irritable
Hi Todd, thanks for that link, I love the "Professor Karl Schneider" article... it was new to me and fascinatingly authentic.
... I am of course familiar with the 'Rudi Nagora' pictures from a hundred and twenty years later [1971] .. they have always been some of "the real-deal" in my eyes and have never been anywhere near debunked. [which begs the question of why aren't they acceptable as being solid evidence?] ... here is the perfect example of evidence that has been presented by a respectable witness, carefully and scientifically examined by several different professional agencies , and deemed to be "100 % Authentic" ... and then duly ignored as being 'tangible evidence'! [perhaps one of those self proclaimed 'critical-thinkers' can pop up and explain to us simple folk ... why?] ... here's what our old mate Richard Haines said after his team's exhaustive analysis of the pictures....
An Analysis of Multiple UAP Photographic Images
(May 23, 1971, Austrian Alps)
Richard F. Haines
ABSTRACT: This paper presents an analysis of 11 consecutive color photographs and related eyewitness testimony of an alleged unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) taken over at least a 10 minute period beginning at about 12:30 p.m. on May 23, 1971, about 30 miles south-southwest of Graz, Austria, by Mr. Rudi Nagora, 25. Details of the camera, lens, film characteristics, and other relevant optical and historical details are presented. Each frame shows a dark and/or “metallic” object in the daytime sky. Its flight path was determined on several adjacent frames by overlapping relatively unchanging cloud and fixed background details. No evidence of pixel distortion is found surrounding any image of the object as might be produced by radiated heat, nor is there evidence of double exposure, a suspension thread above the UAP images, or mismatch of pixel dimensions within the UAP image or outside it. There is evidence of finite object motion blur in some frames where stationary background detail is in focus. A geometric composite analysis of all images supports the view that the UAP’s three-dimensional form is not circular in planform but rather a blunt-cornered isosceles triangle with flat bottom and convex upper surface. The object remains unidentified at this time.
Cheers Buddy.
Fix this
looks a lot like the Hannah McRoberts photo from ten years later
Todd Feinman
tinyurl.com/4atm83v4tinyurl.com/yw38843m
Stick that in your Pipe, Mick West.Hi Todd, thanks for that link, I love the "Professor Karl Schneider" article... it was new to me and fascinatingly authentic.
... I am of course familiar with the 'Rudi Nagora' pictures from a hundred and twenty years later [1971] .. they have always been some of "the real-deal" in my eyes and have never been anywhere near debunked. [which begs the question of why aren't they acceptable as being solid evidence?] ... here is the perfect example of evidence that has been presented by a respectable witness, carefully and scientifically examined by several different professional agencies , and deemed to be "100 % Authentic" ... and then duly ignored as being 'tangible evidence'! [perhaps one of those self proclaimed 'critical-thinkers' can pop up and explain to us simple folk ... why?] ... here's what our old mate Richard Haines said after his team's exhaustive analysis of the pictures....
An Analysis of Multiple UAP Photographic Images
(May 23, 1971, Austrian Alps)
Richard F. Haines
ABSTRACT: This paper presents an analysis of 11 consecutive color photographs and related eyewitness testimony of an alleged unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) taken over at least a 10 minute period beginning at about 12:30 p.m. on May 23, 1971, about 30 miles south-southwest of Graz, Austria, by Mr. Rudi Nagora, 25. Details of the camera, lens, film characteristics, and other relevant optical and historical details are presented. Each frame shows a dark and/or “metallic” object in the daytime sky. Its flight path was determined on several adjacent frames by overlapping relatively unchanging cloud and fixed background details. No evidence of pixel distortion is found surrounding any image of the object as might be produced by radiated heat, nor is there evidence of double exposure, a suspension thread above the UAP images, or mismatch of pixel dimensions within the UAP image or outside it. There is evidence of finite object motion blur in some frames where stationary background detail is in focus. A geometric composite analysis of all images supports the view that the UAP’s three-dimensional form is not circular in planform but rather a blunt-cornered isosceles triangle with flat bottom and convex upper surface. The object remains unidentified at this time.
Cheers Buddy.
Fix this
Todd Feinman
tinyurl.com/4atm83v4tinyurl.com/yw38843m
Yes the article about Karl Schneider is not nearly as known as it should be. It is amazing. NOT a Chinese drone!Hi Todd, thanks for that link, I love the "Professor Karl Schneider" article... it was new to me and fascinatingly authentic.
... I am of course familiar with the 'Rudi Nagora' pictures from a hundred and twenty years later [1971] .. they have always been some of "the real-deal" in my eyes and have never been anywhere near debunked. [which begs the question of why aren't they acceptable as being solid evidence?] ... here is the perfect example of evidence that has been presented by a respectable witness, carefully and scientifically examined by several different professional agencies , and deemed to be "100 % Authentic" ... and then duly ignored as being 'tangible evidence'! [perhaps one of those self proclaimed 'critical-thinkers' can pop up and explain to us simple folk ... why?] ... here's what our old mate Richard Haines said after his team's exhaustive analysis of the pictures....
An Analysis of Multiple UAP Photographic Images
(May 23, 1971, Austrian Alps)
Richard F. Haines
ABSTRACT: This paper presents an analysis of 11 consecutive color photographs and related eyewitness testimony of an alleged unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) taken over at least a 10 minute period beginning at about 12:30 p.m. on May 23, 1971, about 30 miles south-southwest of Graz, Austria, by Mr. Rudi Nagora, 25. Details of the camera, lens, film characteristics, and other relevant optical and historical details are presented. Each frame shows a dark and/or “metallic” object in the daytime sky. Its flight path was determined on several adjacent frames by overlapping relatively unchanging cloud and fixed background details. No evidence of pixel distortion is found surrounding any image of the object as might be produced by radiated heat, nor is there evidence of double exposure, a suspension thread above the UAP images, or mismatch of pixel dimensions within the UAP image or outside it. There is evidence of finite object motion blur in some frames where stationary background detail is in focus. A geometric composite analysis of all images supports the view that the UAP’s three-dimensional form is not circular in planform but rather a blunt-cornered isosceles triangle with flat bottom and convex upper surface. The object remains unidentified at this time.
Cheers Buddy.
Fix this
1851!!
nivek
As Above So Below
Dejan Corovic
As above, so bellow
I know that its Third Phase of the Moon, so don't go mad at me, but they have some good ones from time to time:
View: https://youtu.be/41Rr5NQK3Q0
View: https://youtu.be/41Rr5NQK3Q0
1963
Noble
Hi Nivek, glad to see that my negativity toward this video last year when it made it's first rounds on YT etc and I stated that it was most probably "a balloon" ... turns out to be vindicated. ... It is in fact a "Globo Ilama" .. and what's more, Jaime Maussan [the guy that first promoted it as a "flying saucer-ish UFO" knew exactly what it was!!
....Cheers Buddy.