Gene seems to be a totally shameless person. I think this is what lulls people into giving him yet another break because normal folks cannot really conceive that someone would have no problem being arrested for not paying debts repeatedly and living by deception for over a decade. We nice middle class Americans assume that he is one of us and would never do such things as knowingly take on debts (like luxury apartments) knowing he could not afford them. We cannot imagine that someone would appear so refined on the surface yet live on the very edges of society as a life style, a life style based on lying on a routine basis in order to solicit sympathy and money from his presumed peers. Yet he is not our peer. He is not "one of us". He is a criminal and is known as such by our legal system. He has defrauded his landlords routinely for over a decade. He has made a life style out of using people. He has no shame in being on record in court documents as a dead beat and a criminal. We are naive. We simply find it hard to believe. So even when faced with concrete historical records, some of his Paracast sycophants continue to defend him. "Hey, he never defrauded me, so I don't care if he defrauded other people".
View attachment 2742
This is one case where I hate to agree with you but... I am inclined to agree with you.
It's a cumulative unflattering portrait of Gene that has built up for me, over the course of this year as I've paid attention to the online chatter about him. First you have the years of begging. Seems like weird, compulsive behavior and doesn't make me want to donate to him. But hey I'll admit when someone on the Paracast forum said they were going to give him part of their inheritance, I honestly thought well hey, maybe this will finally put an end to the begging, at least for awhile. Of course it was some prank but, I briefly thought something good might be happening in this weird saga. More fool me.
So I couldn't see the begging as a response to a temporary emergency. (Hey, everyone can get in a hole sometimes, right? But Gene seems to maintain a hole.) Then you have the revelations of Steinberg legal troubles going back to the early '90s, which to me suggests that stiffing others is even more of a way of life for the Steinbergs than I had thought. Then I learn Gene was a Usenet crank in the '90s. As a big time Usenet lurker, and someone who worked for an ISP with a news server, this was significant to me - I know that crank type, and it's not a type I care for.
Then we have: the aggressive responses, bullying tone and dishonesty in the face of anyone discussing his behavior; the heavy handed thought police style of moderation on the Paracast forum; and the hyperbole and flat out dishonesty in some of the begging emails. It's just not a pretty picture, and I'm probably forgetting some of the elements. Oh, well, I see now there are some questions as to whether his in-laws lawsuit that supposedly consumed his life savings ever really happened.
And now finally (I suppose) you have the bizarre behavior of begging to get out from under an eviction only to move into an apartment they can't possibly afford.
Sorry to ramble on about it. It just all adds up in an ugly way.
I do not care for the guy at all and would never trust him, but still, of course I don't want to see a 73 year old and his wife and dog living out of their car.