What is that supposed to mean. I joined here cause i saw some rare cases i appreciated, so i shared some rare cases i saw are not here, and subject of Moon being inhabited came naturally. I did not however expect such extreme disbelief even here. You can accept the presence of ETs on Earth - this whole thread is about it - yet it's too much to accept those same ETs have installations on our satellite.
UFOnauts: What they look like...?
Just a few examples of reduction of contrast and color and increasing brightness (and other "techniques") to wash out details and hide real conditions and civilization on the Moon.
Original full color, full contrast version of AS11-44-6642 at nasa.gov they forgot to "process". Needless to say that each bright spot in it is a city, you of course cannot accept this now, but this will be proven to you in the future. For now just focus on tampering with color and contrast.
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0907/apollo11return_nasa_big.jpg
And how it looks on other page of NASA site
https://history.nasa.gov/afj/ap11fj/photos/44-v/as11-44-6642.jpg
And another
https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ISD/highres/AS11/AS11-44-6642.JPG
And in the footage
99,9% photos and videos have been "processed" like this + rotated/flipped, airbrushed etc, actual conditions and structures have been made near impossible to detect except for those who see through layers and layers of photo manipulation deception.
Today, they have went to absurdity with this - nothing slips out anymore, only COMPLETELY dull, washed out dead Moon is all that is published, and almost everyone is more than happy to swallow. That is why i wrote they (all major agencies) are united in a lie. NASA, ESA, JAXA, CNSA...all the same gang.
So the Moon according to Japanese looks like this
And according to NASA LRO which sends 150Gb of photos daily but is also, like JAXA KAGUYA, somehow incapable of seeing any contrast or color on the Moon while it sees Earth in full color and contrast. Nothing suspicious, not at all.
Just 50 something years ago Moon had rich color and contrast to it - at least in those rare frames and videos that somehow got by with no or minimal tampering like this one below which was just flipped but not decontrasted and decolorized, "not" any more.
Etc. Maybe you'd rather remain asleep.
Original full color, full contrast version of AS11-44-6642 at nasa.gov they forgot to "process". Needless to say that each bright spot in it is a city, you of course cannot accept this now, but this will be proven to you in the future. For now just focus on tampering with color and contrast.
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0907/apollo11return_nasa_big.jpg
And how it looks on other page of NASA site
https://history.nasa.gov/afj/ap11fj/photos/44-v/as11-44-6642.jpg
And another
https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ISD/highres/AS11/AS11-44-6642.JPG
And in the footage
99,9% photos and videos have been "processed" like this + rotated/flipped, airbrushed etc, actual conditions and structures have been made near impossible to detect except for those who see through layers and layers of photo manipulation deception.
Today, they have went to absurdity with this - nothing slips out anymore, only COMPLETELY dull, washed out dead Moon is all that is published, and almost everyone is more than happy to swallow. That is why i wrote they (all major agencies) are united in a lie. NASA, ESA, JAXA, CNSA...all the same gang.
So the Moon according to Japanese looks like this
And according to NASA LRO which sends 150Gb of photos daily but is also, like JAXA KAGUYA, somehow incapable of seeing any contrast or color on the Moon while it sees Earth in full color and contrast. Nothing suspicious, not at all.
Just 50 something years ago Moon had rich color and contrast to it - at least in those rare frames and videos that somehow got by with no or minimal tampering like this one below which was just flipped but not decontrasted and decolorized, "not" any more.
Etc. Maybe you'd rather remain asleep.
Last edited:
Or should i remind of this wikleaks document
REPORT THAT UR DESTROYED SECRET US BASE ON MOON
Date:1979 January 24, 00:00 (Wednesday)
Cable: P790011-1247_e
REPORT THAT UR DESTROYED SECRET US BASE ON MOON
Date:1979 January 24, 00:00 (Wednesday)
Cable: P790011-1247_e
pigfarmer
tall, thin, irritable
OK. You took the effort to post all that and I will take a look a bit later when I have more time.
The link in #543 isn't working. used the search function on archive.org to look for the title posted and didn't find it.
Didn't watch #544 yet but get the gist. I will later.
Let me ask you this - serious question. Do you own a telescope? Have you directly observed the moon to look for telltale signs yourself? You can get a good look with a decent set of binoculars.
The link in #543 isn't working. used the search function on archive.org to look for the title posted and didn't find it.
Didn't watch #544 yet but get the gist. I will later.
Let me ask you this - serious question. Do you own a telescope? Have you directly observed the moon to look for telltale signs yourself? You can get a good look with a decent set of binoculars.
Last edited:
Link works it just takes longer to load for some reason, probably overload.
No i don't own a telescope altho i used to own a camcoder that had 30x optical zoom and i did film the Moon, that is totally irrelevant.
Let's just say i am absolutely CERTAIN Moon is quite densely populated.
You can think whatever you want but rest assured time will show you i told the truth.
As for how many is a guess, i'd say between 100 and 300 million.
No i don't own a telescope altho i used to own a camcoder that had 30x optical zoom and i did film the Moon, that is totally irrelevant.
Let's just say i am absolutely CERTAIN Moon is quite densely populated.
You can think whatever you want but rest assured time will show you i told the truth.
As for how many is a guess, i'd say between 100 and 300 million.
As for William Durand, one guy was exceptionally passionate to debunk it based on a fact in few frames UFO moves while moon does not, he claimed this as a proof of two different framerates, that is, mixing of two videos, this however is by no means so and no proof of fakery as explained by video codec expert in the thread, i read almost all of it. Some dismiss it cause they see no shadow after it exits the crater but then again inside rim of the crater where shadow is visible is in direct sunlight while outside is almost in complete dark so no wonder shadow is not visible. Maybe fake, maybe not. Overall, irrelevant. More than enough evidence in Apollo and other materials to know.
www.abovetopsecret.com
Amaterur Astronomer Detect a UFO Exiting from a Lunar Crater..., page 1
Amaterur Astronomer Detect a UFO Exiting from a Lunar Crater..., page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com
Last edited:
pigfarmer
tall, thin, irritable
This is one of those things where I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree. We’re not going to change each other’s minds.
To indulge my curiosity I’ve been on ghost hunts, seen all sorts of odd things in the sky, sat with mediums. Point is I went and looked for myself and formed my own opinions. In one case all the excellent advertising on an individual I met turned out to be pure unadulterated horseshit, but I only know because I went myself. It wasn’t free and I literally put my money where my mouth is.
The moon is something I see every day clearly in the predawn hours. For free no less, there it is. If I felt as you do I’d be looking for myself with a telescope each day and not sitting inside looking at a computer. With a large population and cities I’d think it would be a revealing exercise. I saw an actual UFO the other morning, something that I literally can’t explain. I think I know what it was but am honest enough to admit I don’t. This because I looked myself, not at somebody else’s video.
To indulge my curiosity I’ve been on ghost hunts, seen all sorts of odd things in the sky, sat with mediums. Point is I went and looked for myself and formed my own opinions. In one case all the excellent advertising on an individual I met turned out to be pure unadulterated horseshit, but I only know because I went myself. It wasn’t free and I literally put my money where my mouth is.
The moon is something I see every day clearly in the predawn hours. For free no less, there it is. If I felt as you do I’d be looking for myself with a telescope each day and not sitting inside looking at a computer. With a large population and cities I’d think it would be a revealing exercise. I saw an actual UFO the other morning, something that I literally can’t explain. I think I know what it was but am honest enough to admit I don’t. This because I looked myself, not at somebody else’s video.
Standingstones
Celestial
I have seen two UFOs in my lifetime. I rarely mention them these days because I not interested in getting BS remarks from ignorant people. These sightings weren’t some speck of bright light in the distant sky. Seeing these UFOs totally changed my outlook on things.
Standingstones
Celestial
You have to be extremely careful when reading about UFO stories on the internet. I came across someone posting about Project Serpo the other day. This person was posting as if this was a true story. When Richard Doty, Linda Moulton Howe and Kerry Cassidy are involved keep your backside to a wall. That story was a complete fabrication. Even now someone is trying to spin this tale as true.
nivek
As Above So Below
@pigfarmer Truth cares not of opinions, yours or mine (except on a quantum level ofc). So opinions are irrelevant, facts only matter. You did not "literally put your money where my mouth is" you only misplaced your money and confirmed your lack of sight. You are wrong about every-thing, Moon, UFOs, ghosts....as time will show you.
As for your main "argument", looking at your own vs others' footage, what is the "logic" behind this, that we should dismiss any material we did not personally record. That's silly.
Rest goes as a reply to standingstones as well
That is perfectly assumed and it also goes the other way, NOT dismissing something JUST cause it's on the internet, or in the book or whatever. It's a combination of correlated knowledge and intuitive knowing.
Scale of contact is huge. There were some scam cases for sure but great majority out of untold thousands are true. This one for example
As it clearly says
BTW i never swallowed the Serpo story as definitive fact and i do not exclude it either, such exchanges have happened for a fact. One example from the case i never managed to find again but i remembered number of details i shared below is one example.
View: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=399006395290806&set=gm.1819252618263340
To reproduce it in it's entirety here
BTW I had a 3 consecutive day UFO sighting which i will retell in short. 2013. summer, first night 9PM i went to the window and peeked up and saw this white ball may be 1 kilometer up, definitely bigger object not a probe, sliding ower the town toward east, after 10-15 seconds i shot up at 45° angle and accelerated until in disappeared, something i will never forget. 45° angle, very very clear in cloudless, moonless, summer sky. Next to days it came waaaaay lower, it was maybe 15meter above sea level near the nearby beach, it scooped the town and went over the nearby hills (little less than 600m high).
So these craft i saw with my eyes, as did millions of others. Majority of them are not our black projects. ET presence is certainty not a probability. But one also has to remember there are underground Earth based groups, not ETs, with high tech. Another thing very hard for skeptics to accept.
Now, as i said, not many things are more ironic than accepting the ET presence and being unable to accept those same ETs have installations/cities on our Moon. That is ridiculous, absurd.
Especially when cumulative evidence from all Moon missions + Earth based astronomers also points to the same fact.
As for your main "argument", looking at your own vs others' footage, what is the "logic" behind this, that we should dismiss any material we did not personally record. That's silly.
Rest goes as a reply to standingstones as well
That is perfectly assumed and it also goes the other way, NOT dismissing something JUST cause it's on the internet, or in the book or whatever. It's a combination of correlated knowledge and intuitive knowing.
Scale of contact is huge. There were some scam cases for sure but great majority out of untold thousands are true. This one for example
UFOs-ET base: French Farmer Taken by Agreement. By Colin Andrews
UFOs-ET Base: A French farmer from the Aveyron Region was taken by agreement and returned sworn to 40 year secret. By Colin Andrews
colinandrews.net
As it clearly says
BTW i never swallowed the Serpo story as definitive fact and i do not exclude it either, such exchanges have happened for a fact. One example from the case i never managed to find again but i remembered number of details i shared below is one example.
View: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=399006395290806&set=gm.1819252618263340
To reproduce it in it's entirety here
BTW I had a 3 consecutive day UFO sighting which i will retell in short. 2013. summer, first night 9PM i went to the window and peeked up and saw this white ball may be 1 kilometer up, definitely bigger object not a probe, sliding ower the town toward east, after 10-15 seconds i shot up at 45° angle and accelerated until in disappeared, something i will never forget. 45° angle, very very clear in cloudless, moonless, summer sky. Next to days it came waaaaay lower, it was maybe 15meter above sea level near the nearby beach, it scooped the town and went over the nearby hills (little less than 600m high).
So these craft i saw with my eyes, as did millions of others. Majority of them are not our black projects. ET presence is certainty not a probability. But one also has to remember there are underground Earth based groups, not ETs, with high tech. Another thing very hard for skeptics to accept.
Now, as i said, not many things are more ironic than accepting the ET presence and being unable to accept those same ETs have installations/cities on our Moon. That is ridiculous, absurd.
Especially when cumulative evidence from all Moon missions + Earth based astronomers also points to the same fact.
Speaking of UFOs.... here is my UFO playlist.
View: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS6CmWwu5VGmXnvdbYD_4jYWzoWoEl2
View: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS6CmWwu5VGmXnvdbYD_4jYWzoWoEl2
Photo of 6 saucers flying in formation above Adriatic sea, i took photo of the page from 50 Years of Amicizia (Friendship). Great book full of details, one detail is how Stefano Breccia was getting drunk in Russia with this ET guy and another lady. They used to smoke and drink. This is one of the biggest most credible contactee cases ever.
And am at the moment reading first book which i have not yet bought, it's partially available here
I shared this case already and photo of the 3 meter tall ET nicknamed DimPietro on previous pages.
W56 W indicating coming from above and (19)56 first year of contact.
It also stands for a reminder that after ever victory (achievement) we must immediately make another victory over our pride/ego.
And am at the moment reading first book which i have not yet bought, it's partially available here
Mass Contacts
Mass Contacts is an astounding story that says that Contact has begun from one who knows. A detailed report of contacts with human type aliens on the Adriatic coast, which answers many of our questions, this book is a milestone for ufologists wh study Contact. They were here and many look like...
books.google.hr
I shared this case already and photo of the 3 meter tall ET nicknamed DimPietro on previous pages.
W56 W indicating coming from above and (19)56 first year of contact.
It also stands for a reminder that after ever victory (achievement) we must immediately make another victory over our pride/ego.
Last edited:
How Moon looks in ARTEMIS' eyes, and pig above vouched for their honesty
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbWMFL66sUo
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbWMFL66sUo
