North Korea

CasualBystander

Celestial
Hey ! Welcome Casual :D I thought you'd have gone MIA in the great AH sinking.
Its refreshing ( actually ) to read your view on this. Oh the liberal and the democrats..

I've gotten a feber or something., Me mind is blurred.. Anyhow great to see ya..


Top-5-Funny-Donald-Trump-Articles-By-The-Onion-3.jpg

@CasualBystander

I was MIS (Missing in sloth).

Thanks for the welcome...

Good to see you too.
 

AlienView

Noble
Unless there is some sort of conspiracy that we can't see - This playing and allowing NK to continue is a path

just asking for trouble.

They have already allowed a mad man to threaten the world, starve his own people to do it, and accumulate a nuclear arsenal and is very close to having the ability, in fact may already have the ability, to hit the US
- Why does the US like NK so much? - Yes, they apparently like Kim - Anyone else would have been history.

Ronald Reagan attacked Gaddafi right in his home in Libya - Why is Donald Trump scared of Kim?
- The Chinese or Russians? - They play politics but will not go to WWIII over a mad man.

So if he nukes Tokyo, Seoul, Hawaii, or Los Angeles, whose responsible? - The US would be responsible for not taking him out now.

Didn't they learn what happens when they appeased Hitler?

Hey, but look, there is money to be made in war, war is profitable - Maybe their paying Kim to stoke the fires of the military industrial complex?

Maybe I just don't understand - Maybe conspiracy rules?
 

August

Metanoia
I'm of two minds on this.

He really can only hit California.

While I normally would be mildly upset, Southern California is talking about leaving the US so that really isn't an attack on American soil.

It is more of an attack on Mexico.

I'm not even sure Mexico is a US ally.

They say he can hit Northern Australia and while there isn't that much up there it won't be very nice of him to drop his tin can rockets onto our country.
 

CasualBystander

Celestial
I see how you can appreciate the greenunists being vaporized lol

What is there between you and California ?

I get the feeling you'd wanna move there, despite your bashings of the far west.

Water is too cold.

Beach house on the outer banks in NC is the way to go.
 

Caeldeth

Noble
Instant respect mate. Thanks for your contribution.
We don't yet have a Salute icon so this one will have to do :Thumbsup:

Appriciate it.

But in all reality and back on topic. I don't think the idiot Kim has the sack to fire a nuke anywhere. It would almost guarantee the total destruction of North Korea and Kim is obviously afraid of death. He wouldn't be hiding behind everything if he wasn't, he wouldn't butcher as many if he wasn't. I would like to think it's just his "Oh shit" button if anybody attacks North Korea and a way of trying to keep himself relevant and making his ego feeling in control. I would like to see North Korea disarmed though because Kim is not stable.
 

AlienView

Noble
Seriously - Do you believe that either John F. Kennedy or Ronald Reagan would have allowed Korea to have gone
this far?

I say no - That is why regardless of right or left leaning, a great leader is a great leader.

IMHO - Me thnks Kennedy or Reagan would already have given Kim an ultimatum - Disarm within 90 days or
we're coming in.

Toying with Kim the way they are doing is more dangerous - We remember tha last egomaniac, Hitler, who started
WWII.

You can say that Korea is no Germany, is much smaller, etc.

So why are they waiting for him to arm Korea so thoroughly so as to become a significant threat???

He already has shown that he has hydrogen bombs and missiles capable of delivery.

Every day that the USA fails to act further strengthens Kim and jeopardizes the safety of Western Civilization.
- And WWIII becomes more likely.

And you might say Kim is not crazy and knows N. Korea would be completed destroyed if he attacked the US or
its allies.

But I'm not so sure that he isn't in fact completely mad - Should we bet the security of the World on the
whims of one man's power trip???
 
Top